This site is satire. Data may be incomplete, links may break, scores are opinions. Verify at Congress.gov before citing us in your dissertation.

Leg day: Fri → Fri (19d) Recess

This is satire. Some of it's real. We'll let you figure out which. Verify it yourself
S. 686 Senate Real Bill Referred to Committee 118th Congress

RESTRICT Act

When Your Acronym Takes Longer to Engineer Than the Policy

Legislative Progress Introduced Mar 7, 2023
Senate Origin → Both Chambers → President
Senate (origin)
Introduced
2
Committee
3
Passed Senate
House
4
Received in House
5
Committee
6
Passed House
President
President
Absurdity Index
7/10
7-8Hold My Gavel

The Restricting the Emergence of Security Threats that Risk Information and Communications Technology Act. A sweeping bill to let the Commerce Department ban tech from foreign adversaries — far broader than just TikTok. Often confused with the separately-introduced ANTI-SOCIAL CCP Act (H.R. 1081).

Sponsor
Mark Warner D
Committee
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Introduced
Mar 7, 2023
Category
Technology

Party Balance

Bipartisan
D
Primary Sponsor Mark Warner
Democrat
Cosponsors (22 total)
R:2 D:1

Key Milestones

2 total actions

Introduced in Senate.

Referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Estimated Taxpayer Cost

$158,316

~2 hours of congressional session time at $79,158/hour

(535 members × $174k salary ÷ 147 session days ÷ 8 hours)

Simplified estimate based on salary costs only. Actual costs include staff, facilities, and lost productivity.

Satire notice: Spending figures, pork tracking, and editorial commentary below are satirical estimates for entertainment purposes. They are not official government cost analyses. Legislative history and vote records are real — verify at Congress.gov .

Pork Barrel Meter
$0
$0$100B$1T+
"Squeaky Clean"

Satirical estimate for entertainment purposes

Watch the Sausage Get Made

See how this bill transformed through 2 stages of the legislative process.

Deep Dive

Official CRS Summary

This bill authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to review and prohibit certain transactions between U.S. persons and foreign adversaries that pose an undue or unacceptable risk to national security. It covers information and communications technology products from designated foreign adversaries including China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, and Venezuela.

Read full summary on Congress.gov
All Legislative Actions 2
Introduced in Senate.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Related Bills 2
H.R. 7521

Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act

Related
H.R. 6174

Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act

Related
Text Versions 1
Introduced in Senate

What This Bill Actually Does

The RESTRICT Act would grant the Secretary of Commerce broad authority to review and potentially ban technology transactions with foreign adversaries that pose national security risks. Unlike the narrower TikTok ban that eventually passed, this bill would have covered information and communications technology products and services from any designated foreign adversary. (Note: The RESTRICT Act is sometimes confused with the separately-introduced ANTI-SOCIAL CCP Act, H.R. 1081, which targeted similar issues with a more memorable acronym.)

Congressional Research Service Summary

This bill authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to review and prohibit certain transactions between U.S. persons and foreign adversaries that pose an undue or unacceptable risk to national security. It covers information and communications technology products and services from designated foreign adversaries including China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, and Venezuela.

The Backronym Hall of Fame

While S. 686 is the RESTRICT Act, a separate House bill (H.R. 1081) targeting similar issues was named the “Averting the National Threat of Internet Surveillance, Oppressive Censorship and Influence, and Algorithmic Learning by the Chinese Communist Party Act” — reverse-engineered to spell ANTI-SOCIAL CCP. Congressional staffers deserve either a medal or a stern talking-to for that one.

Other notable congressional backronyms:

  • USA PATRIOT Act: Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism
  • COVFEFE Act: Communications Over Various Feeds Electronically for Engagement Act
  • STABLE GENIUS Act: Standardizing Testing and Accountability Before Large Elections Giving Electors Necessary Information for Unobstructed Selection Act

Why This Bill Failed (And Why TikTok Ban Passed)

The RESTRICT Act was a comprehensive framework that would have given the Commerce Department broad authority over foreign tech. Critics raised legitimate concerns:

  1. VPN Criminalization: The bill’s criminal penalties could have applied to users circumventing bans via VPNs
  2. Executive Overreach: Broad authority with minimal congressional oversight
  3. Vague Definitions: “Undue risk” left too much interpretation to regulators

The narrower TikTok-specific approach (H.R. 7521) succeeded because it targeted one company with specific divestiture requirements, avoiding the broader constitutional and policy concerns.

Source: This is a real bill introduced in the 118th Congress. View on Congress.gov.

Disclaimer: The absurdity score and editorial commentary above represent this site’s opinion. Bill details should be verified at Congress.gov.

This page is satirical commentary by AbsurdityIndex.org. Legislative history comes from public congressional records; spending estimates and "pork" figures are editorial and may not reflect official cost analyses. Absurdity scores are subjective editorial ratings. Verify all claims at Congress.gov