This site is satire. Data may be incomplete, links may break, scores are opinions. Verify at Congress.gov before citing us in your dissertation.

Leg day: Fri → Fri (19d) Recess

This is satire. Some of it's real. We'll let you figure out which. Verify it yourself
S. 58 Senate Real Bill Referred to Committee 118th Congress

PELOSI Act

When the Acronym Writes Itself

Legislative Progress Introduced Jan 25, 2023
Senate Origin → Both Chambers → President
Senate (origin)
Introduced
2
Committee
3
Passed Senate
House
4
Received in House
5
Committee
6
Passed House
President
President
Absurdity Index
6/10
4-6Pork-Adjacent

Bans members of Congress from trading stocks. Named the 'Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments Act.' Subtle, right?

Sponsor
Josh Hawley R
Committee
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Introduced
Jan 25, 2023
Category
Ethics

Party Balance

R
Primary Sponsor Josh Hawley
Republican

No cosponsors on this bill

Key Milestones

2 total actions

Introduced in Senate

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

Estimated Taxpayer Cost

$158,316

~2 hours of congressional session time at $79,158/hour

(535 members × $174k salary ÷ 147 session days ÷ 8 hours)

Simplified estimate based on salary costs only. Actual costs include staff, facilities, and lost productivity.

Satire notice: Spending figures, pork tracking, and editorial commentary below are satirical estimates for entertainment purposes. They are not official government cost analyses. Legislative history and vote records are real — verify at Congress.gov .

Pork Barrel Meter
$0
$0$100B$1T+
"Squeaky Clean"

Satirical estimate for entertainment purposes

Watch the Sausage Get Made

See how this bill transformed through 3 stages of the legislative process.

Deep Dive

Official CRS Summary

PELOSI Act or Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments Act - This bill prohibits Members of Congress and their spouses from holding or trading individual stocks. Members who own stocks at the time of enactment would have six months to divest.

Read full summary on Congress.gov
All Legislative Actions 2
Introduced in Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Related Bills 3
H.R. 336

TRUST in Congress Act

Related
S. 3631

Ban Congressional Stock Trading Act

Related
H.R. 1579

STOCK Act 2.0

Related
Text Versions 1
Introduced in Senate

What This Bill Would Have Done

The PELOSI Act, the Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments Act, would prohibit sitting members of Congress and their spouses from holding or trading individual stocks. Members who own stocks at the time of enactment would have six months to divest.

Congressional Research Service Summary

The PELOSI Act would prohibit Members of Congress and their spouses from holding or trading individual stocks. The bill would require divestiture of existing holdings within six months of enactment. Violations would be subject to penalties equal to any trading gains.

Bill Details

The bill was introduced by Sen. Josh Hawley and takes direct aim at the broader debate over congressional stock trading. The acronym spells out “PELOSI,” a reference to then-former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, whose household stock trades attracted significant public scrutiny and media coverage.

Key provisions:

  • Complete ban on individual stock ownership for members
  • Extends to spouses (addressing the “spouse trading” loophole)
  • Six-month window to divest existing holdings
  • Penalties equal to trading gains for violations

The Context

The underlying policy question of whether lawmakers with access to non-public information should be permitted to trade individual stocks is a genuine bipartisan concern. Multiple bills addressing congressional stock trading have been introduced from both sides of the aisle:

  • The TRUST in Congress Act (bipartisan)
  • The Ban Congressional Stock Trading Act
  • The STOCK Act 2.0

But naming this particular bill “PELOSI” added an unmistakable layer of political messaging to the legislation. While polling consistently shows 70%+ public support for banning congressional stock trading, Congress has proven remarkably united in not advancing any of these bills.

Why It Didn’t Pass

The irony of congressional stock trading reform is that the people who would have to vote for it are the same people benefiting from the status quo. The committee with jurisdiction over this bill is composed of members who trade stocks. The Senate majority leader who would schedule a vote trades stocks. The House speaker who would bring it to the floor trades stocks.

Source: This is a real bill introduced in the 118th Congress. View on Congress.gov.

Disclaimer: The absurdity score and editorial commentary above represent this site’s opinion. Bill details should be verified at Congress.gov.

This page is satirical commentary by AbsurdityIndex.org. Legislative history comes from public congressional records; spending estimates and "pork" figures are editorial and may not reflect official cost analyses. Absurdity scores are subjective editorial ratings. Verify all claims at Congress.gov