This site is satire. Data may be incomplete, links may break, scores are opinions. Verify at Congress.gov before citing us in your dissertation.

Leg day: Fri → Fri (19d) Recess

This is satire. Some of it's real. We'll let you figure out which. Verify it yourself
H.R. 5326 House Real Bill Referred to Committee 112th Congress

Duck Genitalia Study (NSF Research Spending)

Peer-Reviewed Science, Unprintable Headlines

Legislative Progress Introduced May 7, 2012
House Origin → Both Chambers → President
House (origin)
Introduced
Committee
Passed House
Senate
4
Received in Senate
5
Committee
6
Passed Senate
President
President
Absurdity Index
8/10
7-8Hold My Gavel

The CJS appropriations bill became a battleground over NSF spending after Rep. Jeff Flake successfully amended it to cut political science funding, citing grants like $384,949 for studying duck reproductive anatomy. The research was peer-reviewed and scientifically valid. The headlines were still brutal.

Sponsor
Jeff Flake R
Committee
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
Introduced
May 7, 2012
Category
Science

Party Balance

R
Primary Sponsor Jeff Flake
Republican

No cosponsors on this bill

Key Milestones

3 total actions

Reported by the Committee on Appropriations.

Passed House by roll call vote, 247-163.

Estimated Taxpayer Cost

$158,316

~2 hours of congressional session time at $79,158/hour

(535 members × $174k salary ÷ 147 session days ÷ 8 hours)

Simplified estimate based on salary costs only. Actual costs include staff, facilities, and lost productivity.

Satire notice: Spending figures, pork tracking, and editorial commentary below are satirical estimates for entertainment purposes. They are not official government cost analyses. Legislative history and vote records are real — verify at Congress.gov .

Pork Barrel Meter
$0
$0$100B$1T+
"Squeaky Clean"

Satirical estimate for entertainment purposes

Watch the Sausage Get Made

See how this bill transformed through 3 stages of the legislative process.

Deep Dive

Official CRS Summary

Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2013 - Makes appropriations for the Departments of Commerce and Justice, Science, and related agencies. Notable for the Flake amendment (passed 218-208) barring NSF political science program funding.

Read full summary on Congress.gov
All Legislative Actions 3
Reported by the Committee on Appropriations.
Flake amendment to bar NSF political science funding passed 218-208.
Passed House by roll call vote, 247-163.
Related Bills 2
H.R. 3899

FIRST Act

Related
S. 1862

America COMPETES Reauthorization Act

Related
Text Versions 1
Introduced in House

Congressional Research Service Summary

This appropriations bill funded the Commerce, Justice, and Science departments for FY2013. During floor debate, Rep. Jeff Flake successfully attached an amendment (passing 218-208) barring NSF from funding its political science program, citing examples of questionable grants including the now-famous $384,949 study of duck reproductive anatomy at Yale.

Bill Details

The grant funded research by evolutionary biologist Patricia Brennan on the co-evolution of male and female reproductive anatomy in waterfowl. The research examined how an evolutionary “arms race” between the sexes shaped the unusual morphology of duck reproductive organs. The study was published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and contributed to understanding of sexual selection and evolutionary biology.

However, when the grant appeared in congressional “waste” reports, the headlines wrote themselves. Rep. Jeff Flake included it in his “Wastebook” highlights, and the study became a recurring example in debates over federal research spending priorities. Dr. Brennan wrote a public defense of her work, arguing that basic science research often appears frivolous to non-scientists but can yield important insights. The episode highlighted the tension between political accountability for public spending and the unpredictable nature of scientific inquiry.

Source: The Flake amendment was attached to H.R. 5326 in the 112th Congress. The duck research was funded by NSF grant IOS-0920344. View on Congress.gov.

Disclaimer: The absurdity score and editorial commentary above represent this site’s opinion. Bill details should be verified at Congress.gov.

This page is satirical commentary by AbsurdityIndex.org. Legislative history comes from public congressional records; spending estimates and "pork" figures are editorial and may not reflect official cost analyses. Absurdity scores are subjective editorial ratings. Verify all claims at Congress.gov