This site is satire. Data may be incomplete, links may break, scores are opinions. Verify at Congress.gov before citing us in your dissertation.

Leg day: Fri → Fri (19d) Recess

This is satire. Some of it's real. We'll let you figure out which. Verify it yourself
H.R. 5103 House Real Bill Referred to Committee 113th Congress

One Subject at a Time Act

The Reform Too Sensible for Congress to Pass

Legislative Progress Introduced Jul 22, 2013
House Origin → Both Chambers → President
House (origin)
Introduced
2
Committee
3
Passed House
Senate
4
Received in Senate
5
Committee
6
Passed Senate
President
President
Absurdity Index
3/10
1-3Suspiciously Reasonable

Would require every bill in Congress to address only one subject, clearly stated in the title. In other words, no more hiding the Bridge to Nowhere inside a 1,000-page transportation bill. Shockingly sensible.

Sponsor
Tom Marino R
Committee
Committee on the Judiciary
Introduced
Jul 22, 2013
Category
Government Reform

Party Balance

Bipartisan
R
Primary Sponsor Tom Marino
Republican
Cosponsors (26 total)
R:3 D:1

Key Milestones

4 total actions

Introduced in House.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Estimated Taxpayer Cost

$158,316

~2 hours of congressional session time at $79,158/hour

(535 members × $174k salary ÷ 147 session days ÷ 8 hours)

Simplified estimate based on salary costs only. Actual costs include staff, facilities, and lost productivity.

Satire notice: Spending figures, pork tracking, and editorial commentary below are satirical estimates for entertainment purposes. They are not official government cost analyses. Legislative history and vote records are real — verify at Congress.gov .

Pork Barrel Meter
$0
$0$100B$1T+
"Squeaky Clean"

Satirical estimate for entertainment purposes

Watch the Sausage Get Made

See how this bill transformed through 3 stages of the legislative process.

Deep Dive

Official CRS Summary

One Subject at a Time Act - Provides that each bill or joint resolution shall embrace no more than one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title. Allows any person aggrieved by a violation of this Act to bring an action in an appropriate U.S. district court for declaratory and injunctive relief.

Read full summary on Congress.gov
All Legislative Actions 4
Introduced in House.
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice.
Congress ended without action on this bill.
Related Bills 2
H.R. 2270

One Subject at a Time Act

Related
S. 1572

One Subject at a Time Act

Companion
Text Versions 1
Introduced in House

Congressional Research Service Summary

The One Subject at a Time Act would require that each bill or joint resolution introduced in Congress embrace no more than one subject, which must be clearly expressed in the bill’s title. Any provision found to violate this rule could be challenged and struck down by any federal court.

Bill Details

This bill attacks one of the most widely criticized practices in Congress: the omnibus bill. Massive spending bills routinely combine hundreds of unrelated provisions, forcing lawmakers into all-or-nothing votes. The result is that deeply controversial measures can hitch a ride on must-pass legislation without ever receiving an up-or-down vote on their own merits.

Many state legislatures already have single-subject rules in their constitutions. The federal government does not. Versions of the One Subject at a Time Act have been introduced in multiple Congresses by members of both parties, yet it has never advanced. The irony is hard to miss: the one reform that might actually improve the legislative process can’t get through the legislative process.

Source: This is a real bill introduced in the 113th Congress. View on Congress.gov.

Disclaimer: The absurdity score and editorial commentary above represent this site’s opinion. Bill details should be verified at Congress.gov.

This page is satirical commentary by AbsurdityIndex.org. Legislative history comes from public congressional records; spending estimates and "pork" figures are editorial and may not reflect official cost analyses. Absurdity scores are subjective editorial ratings. Verify all claims at Congress.gov