This site is satire. Data may be incomplete, links may break, scores are opinions. Verify at Congress.gov before citing us in your dissertation.

Leg day: Fri → Fri (19d) Recess

This is satire. Some of it's real. We'll let you figure out which. Verify it yourself
H.R. 3899 House Real Bill Referred to Committee 113th Congress

Shrimp on a Treadmill (NSF Funding)

The $47 Treadmill That Became a $682,570 Controversy

Legislative Progress Introduced Jan 15, 2014
House Origin → Both Chambers → President
House (origin)
Introduced
2
Committee
3
Passed House
Senate
4
Received in Senate
5
Committee
6
Passed Senate
President
President
Absurdity Index
7/10
7-8Hold My Gavel

While this bill targeted NSF spending reform broadly, it became famous for highlighting a $682,570 grant that included putting shrimp on tiny treadmills. The actual research studied marine animal health. The treadmill cost about $47.

Sponsor
Lamar Smith R
Committee
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
Introduced
Jan 15, 2014
Category
Science

Party Balance

R
Primary Sponsor Lamar Smith
Republican
Cosponsors (2 total)
R:2

Key Milestones

4 total actions

Introduced in House.

Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

Estimated Taxpayer Cost

$158,316

~2 hours of congressional session time at $79,158/hour

(535 members × $174k salary ÷ 147 session days ÷ 8 hours)

Simplified estimate based on salary costs only. Actual costs include staff, facilities, and lost productivity.

Satire notice: Spending figures, pork tracking, and editorial commentary below are satirical estimates for entertainment purposes. They are not official government cost analyses. Legislative history and vote records are real — verify at Congress.gov .

Pork Barrel Meter
$0
$0$100B$1T+
"Squeaky Clean"

Satirical estimate for entertainment purposes

Watch the Sausage Get Made

See how this bill transformed through 3 stages of the legislative process.

Deep Dive

Official CRS Summary

Frontiers in Innovation, Research, Science, and Technology Act - Reauthorizes the National Science Foundation through FY2019. Requires NSF to justify the broader societal impacts of funded research and increases transparency in grant-making decisions.

Read full summary on Congress.gov
All Legislative Actions 4
Introduced in House.
Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Referred to Subcommittee on Research and Technology.
Congress ended without action on this bill.
Related Bills 2
H.R. 4186

FIRST Act of 2014

Related
S. 1862

America COMPETES Reauthorization Act

Related
Text Versions 1
Introduced in House

Congressional Research Service Summary

The FIRST Act (Frontiers in Innovation, Research, Science, and Technology Act) proposed reforms to the National Science Foundation’s grant-making process, including requiring NSF to justify the broader societal impact of funded research. The bill was part of a broader congressional effort to scrutinize federal research spending.

Bill Details

The bill became inextricably linked with the “shrimp on a treadmill” controversy. In 2011, Senator Tom Coburn’s “Wastebook” report highlighted a $682,570 NSF grant to a researcher at Pacific University who, among other experiments, placed shrimp on small treadmills to study their exercise capacity under environmental stress.

The researcher, marine biologist David Scholnick, later explained that the treadmill itself was built from spare parts for about $47, and the broader grant funded legitimate research on the effects of water quality on marine organism health — research relevant to the seafood industry. Nevertheless, the image of a shrimp running on a treadmill became a potent symbol in the debate over federal research funding. The video went viral, and “shrimp on a treadmill” became shorthand for allegedly wasteful government spending.

Source: This bill was introduced in the 113th Congress. The shrimp treadmill research was funded under NSF grants highlighted in congressional debate. View on Congress.gov.

Disclaimer: The absurdity score and editorial commentary above represent this site’s opinion. Bill details should be verified at Congress.gov.

This page is satirical commentary by AbsurdityIndex.org. Legislative history comes from public congressional records; spending estimates and "pork" figures are editorial and may not reflect official cost analyses. Absurdity scores are subjective editorial ratings. Verify all claims at Congress.gov